Agreed. I - for maybe 20 years - have recommended reporting on each processor pool separately.
Cheers, Martin Martin Packer zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): https://developer.ibm.com/tv/mpt/ or https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/mainframe-performance-topics/id1127943573?mt=2 Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA From: Peter Relson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 02/03/2019 16:21 Subject: Re: CPU time and zIIP Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> >is that true for CPU percent also? The original post and my answers were about SDSF. They did not show (to the best of my eyesight) or discuss any percentage fields. Are you now asking a question about a percentage shown in RMF? I don't pretend to know anything about what RMF displays, but it would likely not be a good idea to try to lump together busy percentages pertaining to standard CPs and zIIPs because the two types of processors are intended to have different characteristics in terms of how busy it is appropriate for them to be. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
