Here is a list of the tools Rocket Ported I just compiled for my reference  for 
discussions about what would be nice to have in USS … just my opinion, not an 
IBM statement.  Big priorities for me are bash, python, perl , git, sed.  
Others are nice to have and often are used to build other packages.

apache-ant      1.9.2                   160208          License: Apache 2.0     
https://ant.apache.org <https://ant.apache.org/>
                1.9.13 / 1.10.5         180713


autoconf        2.62                    160614          License: GPL            
https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/ <https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/>
                2.69                    120424

automake        1.10                    160614          License: GPL            
https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/          
                1.12.2                  ??????

bash            4.3                     170518          
                4.4                     160915          License: GPL            
https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/ <https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/>

bison           2.3                     160825
                3.3.2                   190203          License: GPL            
https://www.gnu.org/software/bison <https://www.gnu.org/software/bison>

bzip2           1.0.6                   160302
                1.0.6                                           License: Open   
        

curl            7.52.1                  170926
                7.6.4                   20190206                License: CURL/X 
(MIT like)      https://curl.haxx.se/ <https://curl.haxx.se/>

cvs             1.11.23                 160324

diffutils       3.3                     160302

expect  5.44.1.15                       160302

findutils       4.4.2                   160614

git             2.14.4                  181107

groff           1.20.1                  160229

gzip            1.9                     180703

libssh2 1.4.3                           160628

m4              1.4.18                  170511

make            4.1                     160426

mc              4.6.1                   160229

mktemp  1.7                             160302

nedit           5.5                     160229

openssl 1.0.2k                          170414

perl            5.24.0                  180202

php             7.0.5                   170614

pkg-config      0.28                    161125

python  2.7.6 / 3.6                     160229 / 170412

sed             4.2.2                   160229

sudo            1.8.3p3                 170419

tcl             8.5.11                  160823

vim             8.0.22                  170615

webalizer       2.23.08                 160302

zip/unzip       3.0 / 6.0               160304 / 161123

zlib            1.2.8                   160302


Matt Hogstrom
[email protected]
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270

Fortis Fortuna Adiuvat
-  Fortune Favors the Bold

> On Mar 11, 2019, at 11:01 AM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Well, it's not as bad as it used to be, but the original OE option was 
> designed around passing certification and was missing most of the tools that 
> aren't required but everyone has.
> 
> What is the current status of Perl, Python and Ruby in z/os? What about bash?
> 
> 
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> Matt Hogstrom <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 10:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: calling a webservice using HTTPS from batch (and CICS)
> 
> You are correct about GPL.  The concern is likely historical and not the one 
> that would be made today.  There is some discussion at the OMP about hosting 
> the Rocket Ports as a no-registration download.  Regardless, USS needs a 
> serious facelift to include tools and utilities commonly available on other 
> *nix variants like Linux and MacOS and Cygwin.
> 
> Matt Hogstrom
> [email protected]
> PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
> 
> Perfer et obdura: dolor hic tibi proderit olim.
> 
> Be patient and endure: some day, this pain will be useful to you.
> 
>> On Mar 11, 2019, at 10:32 AM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> GPL v3 says "6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
>> 
>> You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms of 
>> sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the machine-readable 
>> Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, in one of these ways:"
>> 
>> They would still need a notice of how to obtain the source.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
>> Matt Hogstrom <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 10:25 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: calling a webservice using HTTPS from batch (and CICS)
>> 
>> Don’t think so.  RocketSoftware makes them available for download.  I think 
>> the key issue is they are GPL IIRC.
>> 
>> Matt Hogstrom
>> [email protected]
>> PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
>> 
>> "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” 
>> - Hanlon’s Razor
>> 
>>> On Mar 11, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Doesn't z/OS come with curl and wget these days?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
>>> Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 9:21 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: calling a webservice using HTTPS from batch (and CICS)
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:55:25 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Now the problem is: I am limited to HTTP at the moment, but customer's 
>>>> politics
>>>> requires me to do HTTPS in the middle and long term.
>>>> 
>>> For batch, would "curl" help?  (But that depends on the customer's having
>>> the Rocket Ported Tools installed.)
>>> 
>>>> I have no idea what I need to do to provide HTTPS communication in the 
>>>> batch and
>>>> in the CICS case; what are my options and what is the easiest migration 
>>>> path?
>>> 
>>> -- gil
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to