https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.e0zb100/osproc.htm

"z/OS V2R3 is not supported on the following servers:

   - IBM zEnterprise 196 (z196)
   - IBM zEnterprise 114 (z114)
   - IBM System z10® Enterprise Class (z10™ EC)
   - IBM System z10 Business Class (z10 BC)
   - IBM System z9® Enterprise Class (z9 EC)
   - IBM System z9 Business Class (z9 BC)
   - IBM eServer™ zSeries 990 (z990)
   - IBM eServer zSeries 890 (z890)
   - IBM eServer zSeries 900 (z900)
   - IBM eServer zSeries 800 (z800)."

They may be doing it, but not in a supported way.

Joe

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:21 AM Jim Stefanik <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That is very odd. The same VM guest starts up fine on an EC12 and newer,
> but anything older than that fails.  z/VM and z/OS are both at the latest
> release level with all current maintenance.
>
>
> Now I'm curious what the secret sauce is to make that work.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Jim Stefanik
> Dallas Vintage Computing Center
> ________________________________
> From: Brian Westerman <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, 6 April 2019 01:49
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3
>
> I wonder how I will explain that to the 4 sites that we have running 2.3
> under z/VM.  Maybe your version of z/VM doesn't support it, but 4 separate
> sites is fairly conclusive:)
>
> actually only 3 of them are z114's the other one is a bc10.
>
> Brian
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to