Mike, Maybe a dumb question, but do you have TRAP(ON) set in your runtime options?
Joe On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:13 PM Mike Stramba <[email protected]> wrote: > No, it's not a "good call". > > I do have the INTERRUPT option enabled. > > At least that's what the compiler listing says. > > What code does the INTERRUPT option generate ? > > > Mike > > On 5/20/19, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good call... the INTERRUPT option is the likely culprit (the O.P. can say > > for sure). Now maybe someone could explain why such an option exists. > > Would you like an 'EOF' option to specify whether EOF should be detected? > > > > TSO is a very-multi-tasked environment. Each command is ATTACHed as a > > subtask, and the default for attention is to mercilessly DETACH it (which > > is essentially CANCEL for a task). Except for the exceptions, of course. > > > > sas > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:03 AM Joe Monk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If youre trying to run under TSO, did you compile with the INTERRUPT > >> option? > >> > >> Joe > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
