Why can't the control statements be in a side deck?

Or you can have a module consisting of PUNCH statements.

On Fri, 24 May 2019 15:55:17 +0000 "Pew, Curtis G"
<[email protected]> wrote:

:>Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE.
:>
:>I’m trying to convert some existing programming and installation tasks to use 
`make’ instead of having to maintain JCL. However, in some cases we are 
currently using the REPLACE and RENAME binder control statements, and I can’t 
see a way to pass those the the `ld’ command. The entry for `ld’ in “Unix 
System Services Command Reference” only tells how to pass object modules, 
archives, and side decks, but not control statements. Am I missing something, 
or is this just not possible?

--
Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to