Thanks for all the responses on this one, especially Jim and Peter, and all the 
links. I unsubscribed from this list some months ago and re-subscribed last 
night, now realizing how much I might have missed (week-long AMODE32 threads 
notwithstanding)   

The info I initially received was from an IBM gent in the z processor group, 
and was consistent with the Processor Optimization doc pg 31. Some time ago I 
converted most of our MVCL*s over to MVC and XC instructions, resulting in 
modest cpu savings. Since that time, I began checking for page alignment of 
source and target addresses and routing to MVCL* rtns when page aligned, and 
lastly tried to make things more eligible for ADM or the 'near-memory engine' 
with BNDRY=PAGE which may have run headlong into fragmentation issue described 
or... 

>  Whether use of the near-memory engine helps or hurts your performance 
> depends on how/when you were using the storage before the MVCL/MVCLE, 
> and how/when you use it after the MVCL/MVCLE.

Thanks again! 
Mike 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Don Poitras
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 10:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BNDRY=PAGE possible CPU hit?

Expanding the ... leads one to (there might be more, but this is the one I 
found):

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/files/form/anonymous/api/library/ff4563be-756e-49bf-9de9-6a04a08026f1/document/07c69512-ac74-4394-87b9-a61ea201347e/media/IBMzSystemsProcessorOptimizationPrimerv2.pdf

Gratuitous wrap noted.

Other files in this "community" can be found at:

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/groups/service/html/communityview?communityUuid=9a17556c-6094-4201-acd0-d8125a3fa0db



In article 
<of5917c456.92910c5f-on0025840b.004f9464-8525840b.004f9...@notes.na.collabserv.com>
 you wrote:
> See page 31 in this document:

> https://www.ibm.com/.../IBMzSystemsProcessorOptimizationPrimerv2.pdf

>  Whether use of the near-memory engine helps or hurts your performance 
> depends on how/when you were using the storage before the MVCL/MVCLE, 
> and how/when you use it after the MVCL/MVCLE.

> Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test  IBM Corp. 
> Poughkeepsie NY

> "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> wrote on
> 05/30/2019 11:12:13 PM:

> > From: "Michael Hochee" <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: 05/31/2019 12:31 AM
> > Subject: BNDRY=PAGE possible CPU hit?
> > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I recently added the BNDRY=PAGE parameter to a set of STORAGE 
> > OBTAINS which acquire storage areas of various sizes from several 
> > low private  subpools. My intent was a reduction of CPU used by 
> > subsequent MVCLE instructions, as ADM would more likely be employed 
> > for MVCLE executes, since the storage areas involved were page 
> > aligned (apparently an ADM pre-req.)  Unfortunately my initial 
> > testing revealed a significant increase in CPU consumption, rather 
> > than a reduction.
> > 
> > I did a few searches of the IBM-MAIN archive and found nothing 
> > involving increased CPU overhead resulting from BNDRY=PAGE usage.
> > Any thoughts on what might be causing the elevated CPU?  Again, the 
> > only change made was adding BNDRY=PAGE. (I have since backed the 
> > change off, tested, reapplied the change and tested with the same
> results)

--
Don Poitras - SAS Development  -  SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive
[email protected]           (919) 531-5637                Cary, NC 27513

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to