Well, the hardware does move a 256 byte area aligned on a 256 bytes boundary very efficiently. And would allow you to load the register with an address without storing the last byte. So a storage pool with allocation of multiples of 256 bytes would greatly helped.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:53 PM Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote: > > Peter Relson wrote: > > >I don't know the answer, but the usual answer is: > > >because either the Java team or the compiler team found something > > >beneficial to having it. > > > > Which leads one to wonder.at what point does the C in CISC make this a losing > proposition? Are we there yet? > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
