I see IEF285I SYS19218.T143507.RA000.xxx00114.R0105346 PASSED IEF285I SYS19218.T143507.RA000.xxx00114.R0105347 PASSED IEF285I SYS19218.T143507.RA000.xxx00114.R0105348 PASSED ...
And IEF285I SYS19218.T143507.RA000.xxx00114.R0105346 DELETED IEF285I SYS19218.T143507.RA000.xxx00114.R0105347 DELETED IEF285I SYS19218.T143507.RA000.xxx00114.R0105348 DELETED ... So it looks to me like DSCBs were actually created. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of CM Poncelet Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 12:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CPU time cost of dynamic allocation >From years ago, I *think* an IEFBR14 step with DISP=(,CATLG) [or (,PASS)] does not physically allocate a dataset on a VOLSER but only registers it in the usercat. Have you checked whether it is in the VTOC? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
