<https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/246938>

But there are some good auditors, and if you're lucky enough to have them 
they're your natural allies.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
John McKown <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 1:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Submitting batch if you don't have TSO

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:38 PM Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:

>  There's no way that adding a RACF segment would reduce the exposure. They
> need to close the loophole. I'm cheering for the auditor, assuming that
> he's not brain dead.
>

Most auditors that I've had to work with are absymally ignorant of z/OS, or
anything other than Windows. Except one in the past, pre-Windows, who was
an idiot. He wanted an explanation of every possible exit in MVS and every
installed product on MVS and what could be done using them. {shudder}



>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>

--
I find television very educational. The minute somebody turns it on, I go
into the library and read a good book
-- Groucho Marx

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to