Bill, What Lionel illustrated is how I make calls in Rexx also. The call can also be an external Rexx program residing in the same PDS.
Scott On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:13 AM Lionel B Dyck <[email protected]> wrote: > The 'CALL CODE 0' and 'CALL CODE 0 100' are simply calls to a subroutine > with a label of code passing arguments of 0 or 0 and 100. Nothing magic or > special. > > See same: > > /* rexx */ > call code 0 100 > exit > code: > arg one two > say 'one' one 'two' two > return > > > Lionel B. Dyck <sdg>< > Website: http://www.lbdsoftware.com > > "Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what > you are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John Wooden > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf > Of Bill Giannelli > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 9:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Rexx calls versus branching > > Thank you very much for your response. > I also have a Rexx routine that has "call code 0" and call code 0 100" > which seems to branch to a routine "code" for error handling? > how are the 0 and 100 values processed? > thanks > Bill > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
