Gil,

So are you saying that you want to invoke GIMSMP from TSO instead of in
batch ?

Scott

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 2:30 PM Paul Gilmartin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 17:20:31 +0000, Leonardo Vaz wrote:
>
> >Thanks for the input. Peter said something about making sure non
> authorized units of work are non dispatchable while the authorized program
> runs, is this something the authorized program added to AUTHPGM has to do
> or something that TSO does? If it is something that TSO already does, then
> why limit TSO to only run authorized programs on the AUTHPGM list? What is
> the harm of allowing any authorized programs as long as they don’t violate
> system integrity.
> >
> >I’m still curious.
> >
> Me, too.  (The scope of the quantifier "only" is confusing.)
>
> >> On Nov 16, 2019, at 11:43 AM, retired mainframer wrote:
> >>     ..
> >> If it is in an authorized library, it needs to take the exact same
> precautions any other homegrown program that runs authorized would need to
> take.  When you authorize any program, you are trusting it not to violate
> your system's integrity.  How it earns that trust varies from site to site
> but I expect most have additional requirements above and beyond normal
> release procedures.
> >>
> Do those precautions exceed those required for JCL //STEP EXEC
> PGM=HOMEGROWN?
>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Leonardo Vaz
> >>> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2019 7:30 AM
> >>>
> >>> I am curious now, does a custom homegrown program have to take extra
> precautions
> >>> to be placed under AUTHPGM? What would those be?
> >>>
> At one point, wanting to invoke GIMSMP via ssh with:
>     /* Rexx  exec1*/
>     address TSO "exec exec2"
>         ...
>     /* Rexx exec2 */
>     "ALLOCATE ..."
>         ...
>     "call *(GIMSMP) ..."
>
> ... I needed to have my sysprog add GIMSMP to AUTHPGM.
> He did so.  Did this create a hazard?  Which?
>
> (After circa 2010, I needed also to be added to a RACF profile to
> avoid some ineffable hazard.  IBM representatives have provided
> no further guidance beyond "Be careful!".  I take that to mean,
> "If something breaks, it's on you, and we still won't tell you what
> you did wrong.")
>
> -- gil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
-- 
Scott Ford
IDMWORKS
z/OS Development

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to