Basically the same as any other authorized program, plus don't trust anything 
in key 8.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Leonardo Vaz <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2019 10:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: AUTHPGM in IKJTSOxx

I am curious now, does a custom homegrown program have to take extra 
precautions to be placed under AUTHPGM? What would those be?

Regards,
zLeo

> On Nov 16, 2019, at 10:09 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Regarding AUTHPGM itself, I think of it this way (pretty much the way
> Steve Smith described it):
>
> AUTHPGM identifies to TSO/E a program that needs to be run on the
> "authorized side" of the TMP. For such a program, setup must be done very
> carefully.
>
> While there is a program running on the "authorized side", the system
> makes sure, as it must do to avoid integrity problems, that nothing at all
> is running on the "unauthorized side". Managing the required
> non-dispatchability of the unauthorized side is key.
>
> If you have something TSO/E-wise that does require authorization but is
> not identified as such, it will be run on the unauthorized side and when
> it does whatever it does that requires authorization, it will be seen as
> not having suitable permission.
>
> Peter Relson
> z/OS Core Technology Design
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to