Jon, Absolutely agree, this is the first time I have seen this but not surprising.
Scott On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:52 PM Jon Perryman <jperr...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 25, 2019, 01:19:47 AM PST, David Crayford < > dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > That's interesting! You said the exit was re-entrant so how is it > > > obtaining the working storage. If it's doing a GETMAIN why don't you > > just increase the size > > > of the storage. Why do you have a constraint of 100 bytes? > > > Some high volume exits are provided with a pre-allocated work area to > avoid a storage obtain in the exit when possible. This does not prevent you > from allocating more storage if needed. If you allocate more storage, be > sure to consider the impact (e.g. cpu or linkage=), > > Jon. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
