1. No; it's a relic of having shared storage. Going to MVS doesn't change that.
2. N/T services is certainly a better way to handle it; there are other ways. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2019 3:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: WTO On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 11:31:51 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >I think the problem with CVTUSER is that there is only one field but lots of >"users" (customer, vendor, other customer department, other vendor, ...). > Is this a relic of single address space design? Is this something better addressed by name/token services? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
