On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 23:10:12 -0500, Gord Tomlin wrote:
>On 2019-12-04 22:13, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> ISTR that many releases ago the document cited explicitly forbade
>> DBCS characters so those would not have been considered "valid
>> hexadecimal". I no longer see the restriction; I doubt that it was
>> ever enforced.
>
>What document is "the document"? I didn't see the OP or anyone else
>refer to a specific document.
>
It was at the beginning of the text you trimmed:
Re:
I'm similarly perplexed by IBM's frequent usage, as in:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieaa200/ENQ_Description.htm
... The name can contain any valid hexadecimal character. ...
... and in several earlier plies.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
