I think we are getting into "how many compiler developers can dance on the
head of a pin?" territory here. I stand by my original answer:

- Yes, be prudent. There are old sysprogs and there are bold sysprogs but
there are no old, bold sysprogs.
- I would be surprised if there were any reasons why having 6.3 installed
would affect how 6.2-compiled programs would run. I would be really
surprised if such reasons existed and they could not be quickly fixed by
APAR and PTF.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Migrating to new compiler release

I disagree with that.  A new version may simply be new features, none
affecting any features the old version supported.

________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 2:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Migrating to new compiler release

> My question has to do with the (probably slight) possibility that the code
generated by one compiler would be different, for the same statement, for
another.

It certainly would. If the code generated for every statement was the same
for both compilers, then there would be no difference between the two.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 11:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Migrating to new compiler release

I understand that the runtime is part of LE, and is generally shared between
versions (at least V5 and V6 seem to share the same runtime for many/most
functions).  Conceivably it's still possible that the code generated by a
certain version of a compiler may have defects.  Probably less likely if the
code is in a pre-existing feature.

My question has to do with the (probably slight) possibility that the code
generated by one compiler would be different, for the same statement, for
another.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to