These recommendations are culled from the procedure we've used for 20 years.
-- With a new (empty) CFRM data set, you should not see any reference to the
production policy.
-- 'IN USE BY ANOTHER SYSPLEX' suggests that you are pointing to (a copy of)
the prod version, not the DR version.
-- You need to name the new CFRM couple data set in your DR PARMLIB, e.g.
member COUPLEDR. That same member must also name your DR policy because there
will be no active policy on the first IPL:
CFRMPOL(drpolicy) /* CFRM POLICY TO ACTIVATE IF NONE FOUND */
-- When we IPL first time in DR with a new CFRM couple data set but a copy of
prod sysplex couple, we are prompted to use the prod guy last used (no) or the
new guy named in PARMLIB (yes).
You can send me notes directly to clarify these or other points.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 11:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: DR Sysplex Procedure
To expand on this...
yes, we are just getting to the DR test:)
I have new XCF and CFRM datasets pointing to new plant id and serial number,
policy but no new LOGR and WLM, using same as prod (on another machine)
defined a new policy in DR CFRM
We IPLd at the other site for DR and got the following-
IXC248E COUPLE DATA SET dsname ON VOLSER volser FOR typename MAY BE IN USE BY
ANOTHER SYSPLEX.
IXC247D REPLY U to ACCEPT USE OR D TO DENY USE OF THE COUPLE DATA SET FOR
typename.
to which both are replied to with U
ISG379E GRS UNABLE TO CONNECT TO THE ISGLOCK STRUCTURE. VALIDATE THAT THERE
IS A COUPLING FACILITY DEFINED IN THE CFRM POLICY AND THAT IT IS PHYSICALLY
CONNECTED TO THE SYSTEM. ENSURE THAT THE CF IS IN THE PREFLIST FOR THE ISGLOCK
STRUCTURE.
CF facility is same as prod and is defined in DR CFRM CF is in PREFLIST
one unusual thing is on my report for the DR CFRM it shows both the prod policy
and the new DR policy but not sure why since I formatted a new CFRM
The backup CTCs are in parmlib but could possibly not be connected. should I
remove those?
Thanks,
Elaine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
