Not sure what "several models of 3380" has to do with me.  We had 3380-D drives 
and the room was full of them so we didn't have room to add more.  Once we did 
start replacing them, we went to the 9343 subsystem and bought lots of floor 
space back.  Also, my comment was for my pre-3380 days when the drives were 
10-25 MB per volume and I didn't say we only saved 1 byte per track.  My words 
were "every byte saved per record".  

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Gerhard adam
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 2:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Here we go again;

  
  
  
    
        Sorry, but “several models of 3380”? If  3380k held almost 2GB per 
module and you saved one byte per record, then you saved the one byte over 2 
billion records to save just one 3380K’s worth of data.  Forgive me for being 
skeptical
        
        

        Get Outlook for iOS
    
  




On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM -0700, "Pommier, Rex" 
<[email protected]> wrote:










Sorry, we'll have to agree to disagree.  It wasn't mythology at my places of 
business.  When I was in application development, disk and other resource 
efficiency was of paramount concern and when I moved into systems programming I 
got to be the one going to the developers and making sure they didn't use bad 
blocking.  

Rex

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of Gerhard adam
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 2:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Here we go again;

  
  
  
    
        ... and so goes the mythology.  The truth is that programmers routinely 
used lousy block sizes and wastes tremendous amounts of space.  JCL sizes were 
rarely scrutinized nor was data set usage.  It was entirely possible for test 
data to exist for weeks or months beyond its usefulness This isn’t to say that 
money was obviousness spent and even wasted, but few installations took 
managing their DASD seriously.  They would worry about saving a byte by packing 
a date while wasting 100 tracks due to poor blocking.
This is why nothing really happened until System Determined Blocksize, and the 
Storage Administrator tools became available. People certainly wrung their 
hands but rarely did anything about it 
        
        

        Get Outlook for iOS
    
  




On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:08 PM -0700, "Pommier, Rex"  wrote:










Agreed.  Another thing to remember was that we were dealing with disk volumes 
measured in kilobytes or megabytes instead of terabytes.  In addition, the site 
I cut my teeth on had all removable disk packs that got rotated onto the drives 
for processing of each application.  Every byte saved per record gave us the 
better chance of fitting the entire set of datasets on a single disk set so we 
could process it.  

Rex

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 12:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [External] Re: Here we go again;

Faulty logic there. A byte here and byte there and pretty soon you have to buy 
ANOTHER unit of DASD. It costs the same empty or full, but if it gets nearly 
full you have to pay for another.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Gerhard adam
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 10:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Here we go again;

  
  
  
    
        The notion of “savings” was marketing nonsense.  The DASD was paid for 
regardless of whether it held a production database or someone’s golf handicap.
It cost the same whether it was empty or full.  The notion of “saving” was 
nonsense and even under the best of circumstances could only be deferred 
expenses 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN






----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN






----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to