This looks as if IBM is trying to run Fundamental Software out of
Business. Flex with z/ Architecture can only run
Linux for z/series commercially is the way this sounds...Julian Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edward M. Martin wrote: Hello Alan, This is somewhat of a vent. Why does IBM Decision Makers drive smaller Clients away from IBM (specifically z/VM and VSE)? The big software about a year ago was CRM. Customer Relations Management (and other names). Peter Ducker (Business GURU up in Colorado) indicates that there is only one PROFIT Center in any organization. That is a CUSTOMER willing to pay for your product. It does seem (to me) that IBM has customers willing to pay for a product that IBM has, and IBM is saying 'NO'. Ed Martin Aultman Health Foundation 330-588-4723 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ext. 40441-----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]]OnBehalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 On Thursday, 04/13/2006 at 12:44 MST, namueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Julian Wall
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Tony Thigpen
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Alan Altmark
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 David Boyes
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Bruce Nunn
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Julian Wall
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Mike Walter
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Edward M. Martin
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Bruce Nunn
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Alan Altmark
- Re: FLEX-ES and z/VM 4 or z/VM 5 Alan Ackerman
