Yes, but since our page rate is <1 I'm wondering if what we may gain with 8G main would be more than lost during those rare occasions that it does really have to page to DASD which in this case is a shark (ESS 2105). Maybe splitting hairs. Thanks Rich.
-----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 on z800 with 8G of memory z/VM still uses expanded storage for multi-tiered paging. It is suggested to allocate expanded storage for a smoother VM paging experience (in the event VM actually has to do any paging). On Tuesday 23 May 2006 12:44 pm, Robert Payne wrote: > Since we implemented z/VM 5.2 about a month ago, I changed the memory > configuration to 6G main and 2G xstore. With our typical workload, > the page rate is < 1 per second. We run 2 VSE guests normally, but the > last few weeks I've also had a 3rd (z/VSE 3.1.1 in development) one > going and it's mostly idle. This holiday weekend I may be making some > I/O configuration changes for the 3590 tapes that just rolled in and > was considering (while I'm at it anyway) changing the real memory > configuration to use all 8G for main storage for VM. All VSE use NOPDS. > Performance has not been a problem, just thought about which might be > better. Yes I know, my mileage may vary. :) > > Any opinions about memory here ? > > Thanks, > Bubba -- Rich Smrcina VM Assist, Inc. Main: (262)392-2026 Cell: (414)491-6001 Ans Service: (360)715-2467 rich.smrcina at vmassist.com Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2007 - Green Bay, WI - May 18-22, 2007
