On Wednesday, 05/24/2006 at 03:34 MST, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is difficult to be too helpful with a problem that even the vendor cannot > solve after having been provided several dumps ;-) I speak of users hung in > LOGOFF/FORCE PENDING status with a deferred work count of 2 and nothing in the > queue. If you can find some way to determine whether it is the result of a > process that increments the count without putting anything on the queue or one > that fails to decrement the count when it has completed, please let me know. > You get extra credit if you can figure out a way to determine how long the > count has been bogus.
Yeah yeah. But Brian actually traced the code and presents us with the bug under glass, all wrapped up with a bow! [Did I mention what a nice guy he is?] It would be great if you could run 2nd level with TRACE I on the first level id to get a trace of the problem since we can't readily reproduce it. So the trace file will be a a bit larger than usual and you may notice a slight reduction in performance. Sacrifices must be made! ;-) Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
