Rich Greenberg wrote:
On: Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:01:27PM -0700,Schuh, Richard Wrote:
} The current VM/VTAM was GA in 1992. We were already using SFS for many
applications and most of VM.
Granted.
Weren't the VTAM developers mainly MVS folks who were porting VTAM to
MVSjr (aka GCS) and didn't speak SFS very fluently. Come to think of
it, does GCS support SFS at all? Especially then?
You are correct, but it is the installation and maintenance that you
would want to put in SFS. That would impose no skill burden on them.
