On: Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:48:47PM -0700,Richard Schuh Wrote: } Rich Greenberg wrote: } } >On: Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:01:27PM -0700,Schuh, Richard Wrote: } > } >} The current VM/VTAM was GA in 1992. We were already using SFS for many } >applications and most of VM. } > } >Granted. } >Weren't the VTAM developers mainly MVS folks who were porting VTAM to } >MVSjr (aka GCS) and didn't speak SFS very fluently. Come to think of } >it, does GCS support SFS at all? Especially then?
} You are correct, but it is the installation and maintenance that you } would want to put in SFS. That would impose no skill burden on them. Yes, but implied by thier being MVS folks is a lack of CMS skills. -- Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353 Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67 Canines:Val, Red & Shasta (RIP),Red, Zero & Casey, Siberians Owner:Chinook-L Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/ Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
