Tom Heugel said:
> Too much ..  thanks to everyone that had something to add. 
> I think I'll just write up a requirement for IBM to add a QUIET option 
to
> all commands.. ie REL Z (DET QUIET

While it doesn't address this particular issue (the fact that RELEASE 
doesn't trap the CP response to a CP command it issued), I should also 
point out the CP SILENTLY command.  If you add the SILENTLY option to the 
ATTACH, DETACH, or GIVE commands via the CP MODIFY COMMAND command, then 
you can use CP SILENTLY DETACH to get CP to surpress all output related to 
the command.  While SILENTLY was really intended to stop the messages 
related to tape drive management, there's no reason I know of you can't 
use it for vdevs.

If you're serious about writing a requirement, I would have to say that a 
requirement to add a QUIET option to all commands would be rejected.  It's 
too broad.  We'd consider a QUIET-like option only if there's no 
alternative.  SILENTLY was created to shut off asynchronous messages that 
can't be trapped by diag 08, and those occuring in *another* virtual 
machine.

As far as the RELEASE command goes, this is one of those Working as Coded 
things.  It has worked this way since before rocks were invented, and 
treating it as a defect to be fixed would break apps such as those posted 
here.  CMS is a 40-year-old operating system and has its warts.  Some are 
lovable and some aren't.  :-)

Regards,
      Alan
 
Alan Altmark
Sr. Software Engineer
IBM z/VM Development

Reply via email to