Title: RE: VM directory entry for shared DASD

I believe it is probably overhead that should be avoided? But even if that is not the case, why buy bicycle tires if you have no bicycle?

 
David Wakser

________________________________

From: Huegel, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VM directory entry for shared DASD


You are all getting me more confused... Why not ALWAYS use MWV for the shared disks? What does it hurt?
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or "Protected Health Information," within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.

Reply via email to