Ok, will do. I have 58 SNA3270P, 11 NJE and 153 LPR (ITO=100 specified) definitions within my RSCS configuration files with RSCS coming up with 16M virtual machine size.
Could the 16M be an issue? Should I bump that up? Thanks Mike -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Geer (607-429-3580) Sent: December 6, 2006 4:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RSCS printer not there but there I recommend if you are still experiencing this problem to open up a problem with the IBM support center Something doesn't sound right Best Regards, Les Geer IBM z/VM and Linux Development >Early this morning we did a VM IPL and I noticed this morning a bunch of >files in the RSCS printer queue which should have been printed on some >LPR printers. > >It appears that a VSE machine was sending files to RSCS but that RSCS >did not recognize the destination printer. It was if the printer was not >defined. > > > >I did the following for one of these printers : > > > >smsg rscs q v222 > >DMTCMQ310E Location V222 is not defined > ><mike> Ready; > > > >However , if I did 'smsg rscs q sys' I would see as part of the list : > > > >v222 released LPR 0000 ... ... priority > > > >I then had to dynamically redefine the printer. For RSCS I have its >console spooled and I see for this printer : > > > >06:30:02 DMTCMX005I Location DEVVM(OPERUTIL) executing: START v222 FORM >* > >06:30:02 DMTCMY700I Activating link v222 LPR line0000 class* >queueingpriority > >06:30:04 DMTLPR012I Link v222 exit routine LPRXONE loaded at 00FBC140 > > >06:30:04 DMTLPR181I Link v222 ready for session initiation > > >07:08:08 DMTNHD144I Receiving file (0000) on link RVHPCS from >RVHPCS(SYSCICSG), records 29 > >HCPCSP053E V222 not in CP directory > > >PRT FILE 2642 SENT FROM RSCS PRT WAS 2642 RECS 0029 CPY 001 N >NOHOLD NOKEEP > >07:08:08 DMTAXM104I File (0000) spooled to SYSTEM -- origin >RVHPCS(SYSCICSG) 12/06/06 07:08:06 EST > > > >I have had to dynamically define a bunch of printers and even after >occasionally a printer would become undefined and I would need to >redefine. > > > >How is this possible?
