On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:04:14 -0600 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fox_Blue?= said: >I think the documentation (CMS Application Development Guide SC24-6069-02) >should reflect that the directory is not sorted. I was browsing through it >and could not find any hint on this issue. Also the CMS Callable Services >Reference (SC24-6072-02) should contain a usage note referring to this. >Thanks anyway for your proposal to overcome this problem.
Then don't forget to to submit a reader's comment form. A good way of guessing that it not returned in a specific order is that there is no way (probably on the open) to specify the order. You know that if IBM did produce it in some specific order, the rest of us would find some way to definitely prove that the provided order was the absolutely wrong order and how could they have been so short sighted. Which is why they made the playing field even for all, and lef the sorting as an exercise for the reader. >BR Fox. /ahw
