Even if the perspective weren't new, it is good to see someone read the
manual. I would think I had died and gone to heaven if 50% of the users
did it. It would lighten the support load considerably.

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CMS Programming: How to sort files entries 
> retrieved by DMSGETDF
> 
> On Monday, 01/28/2008 at 03:54 EST, Fox Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >The directory entries MAY be sorted.  The documentation 
> for DMSGETDF 
> > >is silent on the subject of file ordering, so a usage note 
> that say 
> > >they
> are
> > >NOT sorted would be as inappropriate as one that says they 
> ARE sorted.
> > >
> > >CMS sorts the directory only on ACCESS and RELEASE.  New 
> files added 
> > >always appear at the end of the list.
> > 
> > But this is how you formulate the usage note.
> > 
> > It should point out that the sequence is NOT guaranteed. It 
> is in case
> when
> > there was no update on the directory.
> 
> Send in your Reader's Comment Form and we'll see what we can 
> do.  The doc hasn't changed for 21 years (VM/SP R6), so it's 
> good to see someone use it and bring a fresh perspective.
> 
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IBM Endicott
> 

Reply via email to