On Sunday, 02/10/2008 at 11:45 EST, Ivica Brodaric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was arguing for a special comment statement just for MDISK because I think that > is the statement that cries for comment option the most.
Then you have never set up guest crypto. :-) Unlike you, I have tended to have far more comments on LINKs than on MDISKs, since I care more about *why* a user is linking rather than *what* is on the disk. > I would also like the minidisk comment statement to immediately precede MDISK, > not follow it. MINIOPT already established the precedent of a statement that adds information to the previous statement. It was my intent to keep that model, but provide a more generally useful function. Further, I most especially didn't want to compromise the syntactical integrity of existing statements. And if one has a LINK to an MDISK, and both have COMMENTs, then I expect both to be displayed. As to QUERY MDISK, it could be done of course, but QUERY VIRTUAL has the advantage of being able to handle all virtual devices, not just MDISKS. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
