Could it be that SFS considers this one unit of work and is not closing
the files until the complete FTP ends?

        -----Original Message-----
        From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
        Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:07 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: FTP x86 to SFS
        
        

        I have a process that FTPs two files from a WinXP machine to an
SFS directory. The sequence of events is 

        1. A small file, 10-15 short (<80 bytes, each) records is
created on the pc. 
        2. Immediately thereafter, an FTP is started by the script that
created the small file. It contains two PUTs, one after the other. The
first sends the newly created small file; the second sends a file of
nearly 10,000 records ranging in size from 150 to 800 bytes. 

        
        I have noticed that sometimes, infrequently, the large file
arrives first. This transfer is done over an internal network. Tracert
from the pc to VM always shows the same 7 hops; from VM to the pc, the
same in reverse order.

        Is there anything that explains this as normal behavior? Or has
Chuckie struck? 

        I would love to do the transfer with a virtual machine as the
client, but the large file is inaccessible from any pc on the network
that is running an approved FTP server. Unapproved FTP servers are
frowned upon by Infosec, and thus, by management.

        Regards,
        Richard Schuh
--------------------------------------------------------

This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or 
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the 
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated, 
this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment 
products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any 
transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable 
law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) 
traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each 
sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, 
supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are 
located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This 
message is subject to terms available at the following link: 
http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill Lynch you 
consent to the foregoing.
--------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to