Is it using consecutive puts, or does it have some way to do them concurrently? In my case, it is being done via a Perl script that uses consecutive put commands.
Regards, Richard Schuh > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fran Hensler > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: FTP x86 to SFS > > I have a WS_FTP Pro where I select two files at one time and > FTP them to a z/VM account. I can see from the progress bar > that both files are being sent at the same time. This is in > passive mode. > > /Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA > for 44 years > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.724.738.2153 > "Yes, Virginia, there is a Slippery Rock" > > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:07:17 -0800 Schuh, Richard said: > >I have a process that FTPs two files from a WinXP machine to an SFS > >directory. The sequence of events is > > > >1. A small file, 10-15 short (<80 bytes, each) records is created on > >the pc. > >2. Immediately thereafter, an FTP is started by the script > that created > >the small file. It contains two PUTs, one after the other. The first > >sends the newly created small file; the second sends a file > of nearly > >10,000 records ranging in size from 150 to 800 bytes. > > > >I have noticed that sometimes, infrequently, the large file arrives > >first. This transfer is done over an internal network. > Tracert from the > >pc to VM always shows the same 7 hops; from VM to the pc, > the same in > >reverse order. > > > >Is there anything that explains this as normal behavior? Or > has Chuckie > >struck? > > > >I would love to do the transfer with a virtual machine as > the client, > >but the large file is inaccessible from any pc on the > network that is > >running an approved FTP server. Unapproved FTP servers are > frowned upon > >by Infosec, and thus, by management. > > > >Regards, > >Richard Schuh > > > > > > >
