This is where it would be nice if Linux had a special filesystem driver f
or
WRITING CMS minidisks.

Yes, DOE purchased an ATL of the new encrypting tape drives that z/VM can
not
directly use because of the lack of an out-of-band EKM at our DR vendor. 
So
z/OS performs ALL of our backups, at least as long as the zSeries remains
 at
DOE.

/Tom Kern
/U.S. Dept of Energy
/301-903-2211


On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:29:30 -0400, Michael Coffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>
wrote:

>Hi Tom,
>
>Yep, I've already thought about dropping DDR2CMS (see post I just sent)
>- at least it would eliminate the need to copy the file into an RECFM=
F
>file.
>
>Of course dd from local DASD to a Samba mounted file share would be
>perfect, just one little problem - it doesn't run under CMS(!).  I've
>got literally thousands of lines of REXX code which automates our DR
>process entirely that I'm not prepared to re-write so that Linux can do
>the data delivery.   The SnapShots would have to be done in VM/CMS
>anyhow since I'm not aware of a SnapShot command interface for Linux,
>and various VM-based servers would still have to be brought up/down,
>quiesced and such on VM/CMS so it would get a bit complicated (not
>undoable, just a lot of wheel-reinventing, and of course the end result
>is a process that runs in Linux, I'm a VM'er and like my important
>business processes written and running in VM/CMS).   It was the very
>first thing I thought of when I realized CMS simply cannot mount remote
>EXT3 filesystems and easily read/write to them and NFS was out of the
>question anyhow.
>
>PS:  Did you guys at DOE go the TS1120 route?
>
>-Mike

Reply via email to