Like Mark, I too do not have the UNITADD on the IODEVICE lines. If I recall correctly, you use this parameter to reassign the device number to something else. In your case, having them all 00 should/would cause a problem.
This makes me wonder about my IOCP. I am not using a real 2105 but an emulated 2105 (EMC box). Your IOCP has 8 CNTLUNIT macros with the 768 devices spread across all of them. My IOCP has 3 CNTLUNIT macros with the 768 devices on them (256 on each). >From the VM point of view, does anyone know if there is a performance or other difference between having more or fewer control units defined? Aria On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:03:26 -0400 Mark Pace said: > >About the only thing I see different between mine and yours is the UNITADD >on the IODEVICE. I don't have that in mine. > >On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:47 AM, daver++ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, we are in the process of migrating from an ESCON attached 2105-F20 >> to a FICON attached 2105-800. This is my first FICON IOCP, and I am >> having some issues. We are on a z/800 running VSE (3.1.2) under VM >> (5.2). The 2105-800 is attached directly to the z/800, no director. Here >> is the IOCP I am trying: >> ...snip
