Thanks Alan. i
------ Original Message ------ Received: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:21:41 AM BST From: Alan Ackerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: cp_owned .v. user_volume > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:26:14 +0100, Ian S. Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> 2008/8/4 Ian S. Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > >> > I'm slightly confused by the difference between a volume being cp_owned > >(which > >> > I think it needs to be if its page, spool, disk, ...), and in the > >user_volume > >> > list, which seems to be where it needs to be if its perm -- at least if I > >want > >> > the system to attach it for me. > >> > > >> > What's the difference I'm missing here? > > Others have explained about CP Owned versus ATTACH TO SYSTEM volumes. There are also user > volumes that are dedicated to a specific user. These are dedicated by DEDICATE in the user > directory or ATTACH to user. They don't have minidisks. (Well, if they are dedicated to a VM guest, > they can have minidisks at the guest level, but the top level VM does not use them for minidisks.) > > We use them mostly for z/OS guests. > > Alan Ackerman > Alan (dot) Ackerman (at) Bank of America (dot) com >
