Alan, Thanks. Especially for 5 through 9.
On 8/27/08 12:37 PM, "Alan Altmark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand why you want to use temporary connections. I don't. The original idea was to have connections for each guest active all the time **so long as the associated overhead would not be excessive**. > > You mention an "area" that is monitored by the server. That sounds like > shared memory. I'm not sure the area is shared in the sense you mean shared. The guest machines will each have code fragment table(s) in primary address space. The service machine will maintain the tables for each guest after it has been has granted write access. > > IUCV can handle hundreds of connections with no problem. We think the high-end number of virtual machines could be in the thousands but if the overhead is low and the message incidence is low, it's a go. --. .- .-. -.-- Gary Dennis Mantissa Corporation
