Scott,
You need to add the offline_at_ipl command:
Here is what I have coded...
Devices ,
Online_at_IPL 0000-FFFF,
Offline_at_IPL 0293-02FF,
0390-0391,
07c0-07c3,
0a40-0a7f,
1200-12ff,
2200-22ff,
3293-32FF,
4200-42ff,
5200-52ff,
6200-62ff,
7200-72ff,
8200-82ff,
9200-92ff,
a200-f2ff,
Sensed 0000-FFFF
Thanks,
Nick
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 8:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Eliminating DASD at IPL
We are trying to eliminate all the z/OS DASD we are seeing on our z/VM
system... mostly to cut down on our huge MONITOR DATA and avoid seeing
them in PERFKIT. Our SYSTEM CONFIG looks like so:
Devices ,
Online_at_IPL 0000-00FF,
0120-07FF,
0900-09FF,
0B00-26FF,
5C00-5CFF,
6000-62FF,
6400-64FF,
6A00-6AFF,
6C00-6CFF,
Sensed 0000-FFFF
However - we still see the z/OS DASD -- for example:
q 4000-400f
DASD 4000 SXX06O , DASD 4001 PPX2K0 , DASD 4002 PPX2K1 , DASD 4003
PPX2K2
DASD 4004 OXX312 , DASD 4005 ORX313 , DASD 4006 PGX300 , DASD 4007
PPX283
DASD 4008 CXX105 , DASD 4009 PGX500 , DASD 400A WKX007 , DASD 400B
CMX107
DASD 400C PXX100 , DASD 400D PPX284 , DASD 400E PPX285 , DASD 400F
PPX286
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 07:15:26
Which is not in the range we specified to be online at IPL. Do we have
to use Offline_at_IPL instead? Or Not_Accepted? I guess I'm not
understanding how this works because my assumption was that specifying
Online_At_IPL would limit what's put online to just those addresses...
Thanks for any assistance...
Scott Rohling
