Scott et al, We also use not accepted for the MVS stuff because we definitely NEVER want it online, and as I recall, certain interrupts, or channel offline/online would cause VM to go out and sense it again and bring it online. (But maybe we didn't have the offline at the time). We have: Devices, Notaccepted 1000-8FFF, Offline_at_IPL 0000-FFFF, Online_at_IPL 0001-0005, /* Consoles */ Online_at_IPL A00-A0F, /* OSA */ Online_at_IPL F00-FFF, /* Hipersockets */ Online_at_IPL 9000-95FF, /* Dasd */ Online_at_IPL A000-A5FF, /* Dasd */ etc.
Mary Anne On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Harris, Nick J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Scott, > > You need to add the offline_at_ipl command: > > Here is what I have coded… > > Devices , > > Online_at_IPL 0000-FFFF, > > Offline_at_IPL 0293-02FF, > > 0390-0391, > > 07c0-07c3, > > 0a40-0a7f, > > 1200-12ff, > > 2200-22ff, > > 3293-32FF, > > 4200-42ff, > > 5200-52ff, > > 6200-62ff, > > 7200-72ff, > > 8200-82ff, > > 9200-92ff, > > a200-f2ff, > > Sensed 0000-FFFF > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Scott Rohling > *Sent:* Friday, September 12, 2008 8:20 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Eliminating DASD at IPL > > > > We are trying to eliminate all the z/OS DASD we are seeing on our z/VM > system... mostly to cut down on our huge MONITOR DATA and avoid seeing them > in PERFKIT. Our SYSTEM CONFIG looks like so: > > Devices , > Online_at_IPL 0000-00FF, > 0120-07FF, > 0900-09FF, > 0B00-26FF, > 5C00-5CFF, > 6000-62FF, > 6400-64FF, > 6A00-6AFF, > 6C00-6CFF, > Sensed 0000-FFFF > > However - we still see the z/OS DASD -- for example: > > q 4000-400f > DASD 4000 SXX06O , DASD 4001 PPX2K0 , DASD 4002 PPX2K1 , DASD 4003 > PPX2K2 > DASD 4004 OXX312 , DASD 4005 ORX313 , DASD 4006 PGX300 , DASD 4007 > PPX283 > DASD 4008 CXX105 , DASD 4009 PGX500 , DASD 400A WKX007 , DASD 400B > CMX107 > DASD 400C PXX100 , DASD 400D PPX284 , DASD 400E PPX285 , DASD 400F > PPX286 > Ready; T=0.01/0.01 07:15:26 > > Which is not in the range we specified to be online at IPL. Do we have to > use Offline_at_IPL instead? Or Not_Accepted? I guess I'm not > understanding how this works because my assumption was that specifying > Online_At_IPL would limit what's put online to just those addresses... > > Thanks for any assistance... > > Scott Rohling >
