Yes - that's interesting -- I don't see John's response in this thread now..
But hey - Jim - I appreciate the response regardless! If anything, it's good confirmation :-) Thanks very much for taking time to reply! Scott Rohling On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:00 PM, James Vincent > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sorry for the late and already answered post. Ugh... two days late and > $10 > > short. I suppose I should read -all- my mail when I am catching up! > > Not your fault. The mailer that John F is uses does not insert the > references that make gmail thread the responses to the original post. > I thought the threading was based on text search and matching, but it > seems they use the references: tag. That makes the original post show > like a question that was never answered. It's so easy to get spoiled > by productivity tools.. > > -Rob >
