On 2/3/09 11:57 AM, "Mark Post" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On 2/3/2009 at 11:27 AM, David Boyes <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2/3/09 11:19 AM, "Mike Walter" <[email protected]> wrote: > -snip- >> They also "recommend" bypassing dependency >> checking to force installation of this package, which strikes me as flat out >> wrong. What's the point of a software configuration management system if you >> bypass it or allow vendors to bypass it? > > That is flat out wrong, and will likely result in a system that is not > supported by the OS vendor.
Thanks. I was hoping you'd say that, as the end customer uses SLES. 8-) > When you're the one > in control of the software and packaging of it, there's no excuse for leaving > that kind of land mine out in the field. I agree.
