>Is it possible to not include T-disk space in the remote copy? Its been talked about, but there's like a 1100 volumes in production (and their 1100 mirrors). And only a handful of tdisk volumes... The coding is way easier without having to figure out where we stashed the tdisk vols.
But if VM is doing valid legal i/o's, the XRC shouldn't mind that we do, should he?!! (at least that's what I'm hoping). Marcy "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 3:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Clear_Tdisk question I presume that it was done as a formatting write so that there are no more visible fields following record 1. That would at least be a logical erasure of the rest of the track. If that satisfies Chuckie, or even if it satisfies Alan, it is all right with me for them to use the fast erase method. Is it possible to not include T-disk space in the remote copy? Regards, Richard Schuh
