GMail lets you send plain text. I have plain text set as the default for composition.
-- R; <>< On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:13, Scott Rohling <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes - I guess I knew what I was asking may not be possible for some. I > guess I should just count myself lucky that IBM doesn't require such > measures and I have access to both intra/inter nets directly. > > I've also seen ugly HTML tags .. I use gmail -- hope that isn't showing up > as a mess to some? It all looks fine to me, but I follow these posts thru > gmail. Please let me know - I'd hate to be creating my own form of 'junk' > ;-) > > Scott > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Marcy Cortes > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Some of us don't have a choice if we are doing this from work. >> As another point of consideration, please don't use HTML. It's ugly for >> the folks on the digest version. >> >> Marcy >> >> "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If >> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, >> you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message >> or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, >> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this >> message. Thank you for your cooperation." >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Scott Rohling >> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 7:46 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [IBMVM] How long is YOUR signature/disclaimer? >> >> >> This is a plea to all of you with signature lines with all kinds of junk >> (like all those preachy quotes you might think others will appreciate) -- >> and ESPECIALLY those of you with company disclaimers: >> >> Please find a way to post with as clean a signature as you can. >> >> I've run across some posts lately that are just completely ridiculous. 1 >> line of question or comment followed by 100 lines of your particular >> company's disclaimer. While it's very helpful at times to see where you >> all work - maybe using your personal email rather than your company email is >> a better idea. That way you don't have to disclaim anything and aren't >> helping fill up these mailing lists with 'meta text'. >> >> I'm sure this will be seen as 'meta' discussion - but I'm especially >> cranky today, so what the heck ;-) >> >> Thanks for your consideration: Scott > >
