LTSP is one of many X server options.  There is also Cygwin/XFree86.  Both
are open source options.  There are many commercial X server packages from
Hummingbird, Labtam and others

X servers would have much lower performance impact on zLinux since the
drawing requests are shipped across the network, rather than bitmaps.

Personally, I find the idea of running user desktops on zLinux facinating.
In the 80's and 90's I was a sysadmin for a large AIX system which had
several hundred users.  BillG, Sun and Linux managed to persuade the world
that one desktop == one user, and the idea of multi-user unix systems
dropped out of fashion.  It's nice to see the idea comming back.

Matthew

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Fernando Gieseler <[email protected]>wrote:

> Guys,
>
> You have a idea if the LTSP not fall in this project?
>
> Is a good choice.
>
>
> http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=lenny&arch=s390&searchon=names&keywords=ltsp
>
> []'
>
> Fernando
>
>
> 2009/5/14 Mark Post <[email protected]>
>
> >>> On 5/14/2009 at  1:44 PM, "Ward, Mike S" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Are you saying that you can't use a mouse on linux under VM? Or you can
>> > but the performance is bad?
>>
>> You can use a mouse.  If you're using one of the Linux desktop
>> environments, you almost have to use one.  Performance can range from very
>> good to very bad, depending on what kind of hardware and network resources
>> you have.  At BrainShare 2008, IBM had their brand new z10 EC on the show
>> floor.  It was on the same physical network segment as some of our Intel/AMD
>> demo systems.  I could run a GNOME or KDE desktop on the z10 and the
>> performance difference was hardly noticeable.  But, that was a nearly idle
>> z10 EC on the same physical network segment.  It's not something I would
>> necessarily recommend for a production environment, since it can be quite
>> expensive in terms of hardware and network resources.  Every situation is
>> different.  You might be able to build a business case for it, or you might
>> not.
>>
>>
>> Mark Post
>>
>
>

Reply via email to