You do always have to check. Just because something has not changed in a long time does not mean that it will never change.
Regards, Richard Schuh ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Donovan Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SYSPROF.EXEC Fair enough! It seemed to me as though the discussion had turned to more of a concern over the amount of time needed to rework exits each time service or a new release came out. Since there have not been changes made since VM/ESA 2.2.0, I was curious as to why the perception existed that there was a strong need to constantly rework user updates. If there is real function missing, then by all means, continue the discussion. Thanks! Mike [cid:[email protected]]"Schuh, Richard" <[email protected]> "Schuh, Richard" <[email protected]> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]> 07/16/2009 07:20 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject Re: SYSPROF.EXEC As I recall, this discussion started out as a thought that it would be nice to have exits in SYSPROF so that we do not have to create our own or otherwise modify SYSPROF. Just the fact that many of us do insert and use exits might be interpreted as our thinking that SYSPROF perhaps should have been enhanced over the years. Regards, Richard Schuh
