Bob,

I recall doing this a long time ago too. Just tried it again, since my
z/VM 5.4 system is sitting there in a second level guest, waiting for
clients to test.

The ID card format I used is

ID MAINT

and the file was punched to the reader for my second level guest.

I had to fight with the 00C on the second level to get it to start
though. Had to use:

SET REDEVICE 00C TYPE READER
VARY ON 00C
CP START UR 00C

To make it work, but it did.The file is in MAINT's RDR on the second
level guest.

But I did not put the :READ card in with the ID card. Just the one ID
line. PUNCH will put the :READ at the top of the second file if you
want it - leave off the (NOH


On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Bob Bates <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>         I know there are other ways of doing this, but I can't let go of
> this now that I've thought about it.
>
>         I have a simple 2nd level test system running. I want to send a file
> from 1st level to a user on the 2nd level system. I'm trying to use a
> process from the dark ages of VM/370.
>
>         SPOOL D LEVEL2
>         SPOOL D CONT
>         PUNCH PUNCH HEADER A ( NOH
>         PUNCH THIS FILE A ( NOH
>         SPOOL D NOCONT
>         CLOSE D
>
>         On 2nd level do a START C and the file goes where it needs. The
> question comes about the contents of PUNCH HEADER file:
>
>         USERID MYID
>         :READ THIS FILE
>
>         Card one is wrong and I can't remember/find the correct format.
> HCPRSR431E says it should be ID MYID or USERID MYID but neither works.
>
>         Ideas?
>
>
> Bob Bates
> Enterprise Hosting Services
> w. (469)892-6660
> c. (214) 907-5071
>
> “This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If
> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
> you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message
> or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message.  Thank you for your cooperation."
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to