Doesn't "SEND CP OPERATOR ..." or "FOR OPERATOR ..." constitute "having the operator" do it? Neither of those is an acceptable solution, at least not here.
Regards, Richard Schuh ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RSCS Messages What about CP SEND RSCS RSCS START xxx Then it is RSCS itself that starts the link, Or to complete what Mike mentions (and what I regularly used, not only for RSCS) CP FOR OPERATOR CMD SMSG RSCS START xxx or, a bit old fashioned CP SEND CP OPERATOR SMSG RSCS START xxx for RSCS the 2 commands above come from OPERATOR, not your userid. 2010/8/12 Michael Harding <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> The CP "for" command may be your friend here; after all, SMSG IS a CP command... -- Mike Harding z/VM System Support The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote on 08/12/2010 01:18:40 PM: > From: "Schuh, Richard" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Date: 08/12/2010 01:19 PM > Subject: Re: RSCS Messages > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > Having the operator do anything other than a simple START, including > "PARM anything" requires an approval process. That said, a scan of > the config file reveals that an id that rarely logs on is > authorized. I will use it as my surrogate. Thanks for the idea. > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
