The OPERATOR id is used by the operators. Any commands executed on it should come from them, else, accountability flies out the window. If a mistake is made from it, I do not want it to be one that I caused by my somewhat unreliable typing skills. Neither does my management want that to happen.
Regards, Richard Schuh ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Harding Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RSCS Messages It depends too on how your procedures define "operator". Do they refer to the OPERATOR userid or the <supposedly human> console operator? -- Mike Harding z/VM System Support [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (925) 926-3179 (w) (925) 323-2070 (c) IM: VMBearDad (AIM), mbhcpcvt (Y!) The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]> wrote on 08/16/2010 08:54:33 AM: > From: Kris Buelens <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 08/16/2010 08:55 AM > Subject: Re: RSCS Messages > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]> > > Yes indeed, but you can replace OPERATOR by any other user that has > the right RSCS privs. I hoped that was obvious. > 2010/8/16 Schuh, Richard <[email protected]> > Doesn't "SEND CP OPERATOR ..." or "FOR OPERATOR ..." constitute > "having the operator" do it? Neither of those is an acceptable > solution, at least not here. > > Regards, > Richard Schuh
