I guess fedora does not have hard rule for internal exe files. The
application can install them in libexec or pkglibexec. But seems most apps
will install them in libexec. So I am think debian have to patch many apps
for installing internal exec in pkglibexec, right?

Peng

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Osamu Aoki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, (excuse me you if you get this as 2nd mainl.  I have mail
> instability.)
>
> Please help me educated for recent FEDORA changes.  I only know RH4 and
> RH5 days.
>
> I am OK to keep applying such patches for the moment for pgklibexec on
> Debian.
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:42:46AM -0500, Peng Huang wrote:
> > I checked those patches and merged the first one. For other patches,I
> think
> > it is not safe to add them in 1.4.1. Is it OK for fedora. I think we
> > install most programs in libexec instead of pgklibexec on fedora.
>
> So you mean to install these programs as:
>  /usr/libexec/ibus-gconf
>  /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-gtk
>  /usr/libexec/ibus-x11
> but not as
>  /usr/libexec/ibus/ibus-gconf
>  /usr/libexec/ibus/ibus-ui-gtk
>  /usr/libexec/ibus/ibus-x11
> for FEDORA.
>
> Does FEDORA keeps all such package internal executables directly under
> /usr/libexec/ ?  Just curious.


> Regards,
>
> Osamu
>
> PS: FYI:  For now, Debian is not using /usr/libexec but it is using
> /usr/lib for both package internal executables and shared libraries.  My
> impression is Debian wishes to avoid overloading its classic /usr/lib
> (now it is actually /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu under the multiarch) too
> clowded to slow the system.  It uses /usr/lib/@@packagename@@/ (now it
> is really /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/@@packagename@@/ under multiarch)
> for such programs in general as I observe.  For me, tracking RH is good
> idea on merging /bin and /usr/bin and using /usr/libexec.  Although this
> is not what is happening on Debian.  Debian tends to put heavy weight
> value to the smooth upgrade and to the admin local configuration than
> other distributions.  This sometimes becomes really havy burden and
> slows adoption of new style and technology.
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "ibus-devel" group.
iBus project web page: http://code.google.com/p/ibus/
iBus dev group: http://groups.google.com/group/ibus-devel?hl=en

回复