Hi, Please help me educated for recent FEDORA changes. I only know RH4 and RH5 days.
I am OK to keep applying such patches for the moment for pgklibexec on Debian. On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:42:46AM -0500, Peng Huang wrote: > I checked those patches and merged the first one. For other patches,I think > it is not safe to add them in 1.4.1. Is it OK for fedora. I think we > install most programs in libexec instead of pgklibexec on fedora. So you mean to install these programs as: /usr/libexec/ibus-gconf /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-gtk /usr/libexec/ibus-x11 but not as /usr/libexec/ibus/ibus-gconf /usr/libexec/ibus/ibus-ui-gtk /usr/libexec/ibus/ibus-x11 for FEDORA. Does FEDORA keeps all such package internal executables directly under /usr/libexec/ ? Just curious. Regards, Osamu PS: FYI: For now, Debian is not using /usr/libexec but it is using /usr/lib for both package internal executables and shared libraries. My impression is Debian wishes to avoid overloading its classic /usr/lib (now it is actually /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu under the multiarch) too clowded to slow the system. It uses /usr/lib/@@packagename@@/ (now it is really /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/@@packagename@@/ under multiarch) for such programs in general as I observe. For me, tracking RH is good idea on merging /bin and /usr/bin and using /usr/libexec. Although this is not what is happening on Debian. Debian tends to put heavy weight value to the smooth upgrade and to the admin local configuration than other distributions. This sometimes becomes really havy burden and slows adoption of new style and technology. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ibus-devel" group. iBus project web page: http://code.google.com/p/ibus/ iBus dev group: http://groups.google.com/group/ibus-devel?hl=en
