Thanks but they changed in 88 and we have an 82.Thanks anyway!
--- On Sun, 10/25/09, Bill Keaveney <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Bill Keaveney <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [IC27A] Re: New owner needing advice
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, October 25, 2009, 11:11 PM












 
 




    
                  Ebay is currently listing a hatch for a 1988 Catalina 27 for 
$50.00 plus

shipping! I hope that this will help! Search Catalina 27.



Bill

  -----Original Message-----

  From: ic...@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ic...@yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of

Victoria Bayly

  Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 7:34 PM

  To: ic...@yahoogroups. com

  Subject: Re: [IC27A] Re: New owner needing advice



Unfortunately the fiberglass is soaked with water from the leak so I

think there maybe more than one. It is the trapezoidal deck hatch forward of

the mast. I see at CatalinaOwner. com they have an original but it is $ 600

so I was trying to find alternatives. I was hoping maybe someone else had to

replace theirs and had suggestions.



--- On Sun, 10/25/09, RobAdkins <robadk...@lifetalef ilms.com> wrote:



From: RobAdkins <robadk...@lifetalef ilms.com>

  Subject: [IC27A] Re: New owner needing advice

  To: ic...@yahoogroups. com

  Date: Sunday, October 25, 2009, 10:16 PM



vicki,



to which hatch are you referring? possibly fixed with new rubber seal or

something of that nature without a replacement. -rob



--- In ic...@yahoogroups. com, "VickiB" <offmgr...@. ..> wrote:



>



> We just bought a 1982 and we are starting our list of things to do to

her. My first ( I am sure of many to come ) concern is the hatch. It has a

leak and we need to replace it. Any ideas who would be the best place to get

one? Also, we live in the DC metro area and I want to get new cushions made.

Any suggestions without breaking the bank?



> Thanks!



> Vicki



>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 

      

    
    
        
         
        
        




        




        
        


        
        
        




      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to