What a pain in the a**. I decided to do this today when the wind was gusting to 
60. The force of the wind had the boat heeling in the slip. I couldn't get my 
internet connection to my laptop through my Blackberry so when I tried to get 
back to this forum to see the recommendations, I couldn't. 
After removing the refrigerator and cleaning all the terminals, it seems that 
it might actually be accurate. If full, full is anything like empty, empty then 
it's definitely working. I removed the top wire and put it to the ground and it 
went lower than I've ever seen it. It turns out that I simply don't know how to 
read a meter but I got a reading between 150 and 175 ohms ???...The boat was 
rocking. 

I don't really have anything to stick in the tank but I will try that next. It 
seems I just might not use much fuel.....or I'm an idiot who is going to run 
out when I least expect it. 

Thank you for the comments and suggestions...

Sincerely, 

Michael


 
--- In [email protected], David Savlin <dsav...@...> wrote:
>
> If your sender is like mine, it works as a variable resistor (aka
> potentiometer) from 33 to 240 ohms. The higher the resistance, the lower the
> fuel level. You can disconnect the wires from the sender that is atop the
> fuel tank and hook up a multimeter set to the 200 or 2k ohm range to take a
> reading. If you get a reading of, say, 120 ohms, the tank is approximately
> half full, and you should check the wiring to the gauge to make sure there
> is not an open circuit (broken wire).
> 
> I would expect the gauge to drop to empty when power is removed from the
> gauge by turning off / removing the key. Your description seems to me to
> indicate there's an open circuit somewhere. With the key turned on, if you
> take the top wire off the sender and ground it to something, the fuel gauge
> should swing to "empty". If not, that would confirm the wire to the gauge is
> broken somewhere, or there's a busted connector.
> 
> Note that if the sender is bad, or flaking out, it may be more useful to use
> an analog multimeter. On my boat, Persephone, the fuel gauge needle jumps
> all over town; when I used my digital multimeter, the readings were all over
> the place and it was difficult to get an idea of what was going on. I bought
> an analog multimeter and the needle on the meter acted just like my fuel
> gauge, which allowed me to narrow the problem down specifically to the
> sender. Note that analog multimeters can provide notoriously inaccurate
> measurements unless a quality (thus relatively expensive) meter is
> purchased, but for a simple test like I needed, a cheap one served the
> purpose.
> 
> On that note, can anyone give advice on replacing the sender? I picked up a
> replacement Teleflex sender, and it comes with a gasket, but I'd appreciate
> advice even though it looks simple. Is it true that diesel fumes are not as
> explosive as gasoline fumes? The Teleflex instructions don't call for any
> special sealant or "liquid gasket" but is that a decent idea? Finally, can
> anyone recommend a cutting wheel for a Dremel to cut a bit of the fiberglass
> above the tank so I have room to remove and install the senders? (The sender
> was clearly pre-installed to the tank before the tank was fiberglassed into
> place...)
> 
> David
> Persephone, 1988 hull #6480
> (Now at home in our slip at Montrose Harbor, Chicago!)
> 
> PS -- our transit from Racine, Wisconsin to "home" happened this past
> Wednesday, with winds from 10 to 25 knots the whole ride. We stuck with just
> our main and the motor to assist, and we cleared 6+ knots the entire ride
> and had a blast!
> 
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Michael <mlong9...@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > I've run the engine for approximately 20 hours and my gauge still reads
> > close to full. The gauge goes down to "empty" when the key is disengaged and
> > to almost "full" when I turn the key. Is it possible that I would be
> > anywhere near full after approx 20 hours of use? Is there another way to
> > tell how much fuel is in the tank without filling it to the top? Any
> > thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks
> >
> >  
> >
>


Reply via email to